rifftest
The research platform that refuses to guess.
✓ Verified US HCPs & patients — September
✓ Every number computed, receipted, benchmarked
✓ "Statistical tie — don't decide yet." Honesty, engineered.
From the team behind Riffcheck · a UniteRare LLC product

Sign in

Preview access: any email + password demo

Production sign-in: SSO + verified identity. No impersonation — approvals are signature-grade. ← rifftest.com

More research. Same rigor. Your standards, enforced at scale. preview · launching September

Team workspace

Attribution is bound to your login and enforced server-side (row-level security) — the client can never choose an author. Approvals require password re-entry and are recorded as append-only signatures. Email only carries a link back here.

Confirm your identity

This action is recorded as a signature — re-enter your password to sign. (Demo password: demo)

Your studies
Design a new study
Your consultant is ready
NASH TPP vs comparatorreport ready
US Hepatologists · Choice-based conjoint · you + 2 teammates
Efficacy message screenreport ready
US Neurologists · Message test · you
Patient journey surveydraft
US Patients · Journey quant · you + 1

Your research team,
multiplied.

Rifftest runs the studies your team doesn't have hours for — designed to your standards, pressure-tested before fielding, synthetically pretested in minutes, and delivered decision-ready. Researchers set the guardrails; the whole organization moves at the speed of the question.

🎓 Built on research rigor, not around itMethods, wording checks, and sample math follow the standards a trained researcher would apply — enforced automatically on every study, and reviewable by yours.
🧾 Numbers with receiptsEvery figure is computed, never AI-guessed — and carries a receipt tracing exactly how it was made. Your insights team can audit anything.
👥 Synthetic first, real when it mattersInstant synthetic pretest for direction; one click pipes the same study to verified real people for decisions.
⚙️ For insights teamsSet the templates, brand standards, and approval gates once — then every study anyone runs inherits them. Fewer repetitive asks; more time for the strategic work only you can do.
🚀 For everyone elseAsk in plain words, get a governed, decision-ready read in minutes — inside the guardrails your research team set.
📉 For the budget ownerA fraction of per-study agency cost, with fielding priced transparently at pass-through + a published service fee.
Study design · the same review your agency would walk you through

Let's design this properly.

STEP 1Ground the study
STEP 2Audience & stimuli
STEP 3Questionnaire & approve

Your design consultant Claude-powered

Build on what you already know optional

Upload prior studies, briefs, or past decksThe designer reads them and designs to validate what you know instead of re-asking it. Text files in the preview; PDF/DOCX at launch.

Synthetic audience

Modeled n

Synthetic personas modeled on this audience — instant, free, watermarked. Verified real respondents open in September; the design carries over unchanged.

Your stimuli — real wording, one per line

Paste your actual messages, TPP attributes, or price points (2–8). The engine scores your words — the per-option power guard applies.

Questionnaire — validated template, bias-guarded

Wording flags are reviewed, never silently rewritten. In production this step routes through your e-signature approval chain — questionnaire → pretest → sample → fielding, each gate signed.

Running your study

Synthetic pretest report

Report

SYNTHETIC
Directional read from a synthetic pretest (n=300 modeled respondents) — not for launch decisions. Great for direction and killing weak options; validate with real people before committing spend. Charts are watermarked so this label survives any screenshot, and synthetic results are stored separately from fielded data — they never commingle.

The verdict, against your decision every number receipt-bound

Results by option

SYNTHETIC · DIRECTIONAL

Segment cuts preview

Recommended next steps

Methodology appendix — design, screening & quality

Method: ·

Screener + re-screen consistency probe applied · attention trap + reverse-worded straightliner trap inserted · wording flags reviewed, never silently rewritten · per-option power guard enforced.

Field with real people — coming September

Fielding opens this September. Same study, same analysis — verified US HCPs and patients, honoraria passed through at documented vendor cost, quote before anything fields. Join the fielding waitlist →

Cost estimate preview — fielding opens September

Sample sizen = 300

Fielding runs through verified panels (Prolific, Cint, M3, Rare Patient Voice) with identity checks, attention traps, and consent. Results replace the synthetic read and the validity gate re-scores — you see exactly where synthetic was right and wrong.

Field operations

The client-approval chain, real-time translations, live quality control, and the focus-room playbook — everything between "approved design" and "clean data."

Client approval chain — stage-gated, snapshot-bound

Each gate unlocks only when the prior one is signed. Approvals bind to a frozen snapshot — changing anything upstream voids every approval downstream automatically. Approved materials are locked artifacts: download or email-share from the gate.

Translations — approvable-grade, per language MT → back-translation → linguist → client sign-off

For ex-US fielding, each language is machine-translated, back-translated for semantic checking, scored, and any deviation flagged for the human linguist — then the client approves per language, side by side, in real time. Nothing under threshold is silently accepted.

Live QC — while interviews are happening ● fielding

FlagRuleAction taken

Every removal is audited with the rule that fired — replacements auto-recruited so quotas still land. Respondents can pause and resume at any question; state is saved server-side and the resume link re-checks quota + screening before continuing.

Virtual focus rooms — designed for what goes wrong

What goes wrongHow the room is built for it

Recordings & transcripts — the session vault

Cameras are optional — participants can join video, audio-only, or dial-in; sessions record only with consent on file. Consented recordings stay in your account room for your team to watch anytime; transcripts are auto-generated (speaker-attributed, PII-redacted) and available to view or download right after the session.

SessionConsentRecordingTranscript

Access is workspace-scoped (viewers can watch; nothing is public). Retention follows your workspace policy and the consent terms — when consent limits retention, the vault enforces expiry automatically. A participant who declines recording can still take part: notes-only mode, clearly flagged in analysis.

Re-screening at interview start — confirm they still qualify

Panel data ages: people switch jobs, treatments change, quotas fill. Before any interview begins, 2–3 screener confirmations re-run. A mismatch closes the session gracefully — thanked, partial incentive per policy, never "you failed" — and the quota slot is released for auto-replacement.

Report suite

Every study's final deliverables, warehoused and alive — exports on your template, an AI presentation your audience can interrogate, the questions people actually asked, and the PV console.

Client template

Upload your PowerPoint template (.pptx)
We extract the master, layouts, fonts and logo — every export renders on your branding.

Final reports — single source of truth

StudyStatusExports

Word export downloads a real document; PowerPoint renders server-side onto the active template. Every exported figure carries its receipt in the slide notes — numbers stay auditable even inside a deck.

AI presentation — a debrief your audience can interrogate

Pick how long your audience has. The presenter ranks findings by decision-relevance and fits the story to the time — 3 minutes gets the verdict and the one thing to do; 60 minutes gets the full walkthrough. Viewers ask questions while it plays; it pauses, answers from the computed results only, and resumes. Watch or listen anytime — unlike a meeting recording, it answers back.

Q&A ledger — what people actually asked

Every question asked in any presentation session is captured with its answer, organized by topic. Frequent questions surface to new viewers up front; unanswerable ones become follow-up tasks for the study owner. This is the institutional memory a meeting recording never becomes.

PV console — adverse-event reporting, gated and on the clock

The manufacturer's own PV form is ingested once. When an interview surfaces a candidate adverse event, the form auto-populates from the transcript and lands here — nothing sends without your one-click review. The 24-hour clock runs from detection, with escalating reminders; the T-minus fail-safe policy (escalate vs. send-flagged) is set with the client's PV team.

Ingest manufacturer PV form / format
Active: AcmePharma_AE_Intake_v4.docx · routing: pv-intake@acmepharma.example (demo)

The study menu

Every study includes AI design, a free synthetic pretest, e-signature approvals, live-QC fielding, a receipt-bound report on your template, and an interactive AI presentation. join the launch list for early rates.

Free — Synthetic pretest

Unlimited · minutes
  • Directional aggregate read, watermarked
  • Forwardable one-slide for your approver
  • Honest verdicts — including "statistical tie, don´t decide yet"
ONE DECISION · ~1 WEEK

Pulse

n≈100–150 · US HCPs or patients
  • "Which message wins?" (≤3, directional screen)
  • "Is this concept worth pursuing?"
  • "How do doctors read our TPP?"
  • "Which name or design?"
  • Add-on: patient-materials comprehension check

Standard

One strategy question · 2–3 weeks · n≈150–300
  • Full concept test vs norms (provenance disclosed)
  • Pricing study (Van Westendorp + Gabor-Granger)
  • "What matters most?" (MaxDiff)
  • TPP deep evaluation · Market snapshot
  • Patient-journey survey · Launch pre/post bundle

Forecast-grade

4–6 weeks · decision-critical
  • Conjoint / discrete-choice
  • Full segmentation (n≥800)
  • Demand forecast (choice-calibrated)

Trackers

Quarterly or biannual waves
  • "Is our market position moving?"
  • "Is our brand getting stronger?"

Roadmap — Phase II

Stated honestly, not silently absent
  • KOL & expert interviews · fast qual
  • Payer / market-access module
  • Caregiver module · epi market-sizing
  • Competitive-response pulse · finished-creative testing
Every study, one standard: capped all-in quotes, honoraria at documented vendor cost, and an agency partner program — details with your consultant or at hello@rifftest.com.